Amazon Wants To Build A Bio-Dome Three Blocks From An Actual, Normal Park

1-5bf895d6e2

Amazon has reportedly submitted plans for a new futuristic headquarters in Seattle that combines a skyscraper and a tri-sphere, bio-dome-like structure. According to the plans, the structure will be able to hold various forms of plant life and become a place where employees can “work and socialize in a more natural, park-like setting.”

Because, God forbid, employees walk to the park that’s three blocks away.

Here’s an excerpt from the plans (also, hat tip to GeekWire for the find):

While the form of the building will be visually reminiscent of a greenhouse or conservatory, plant material will be selected for its ability to co-exist in a microclimate that also suits people. To encourage growth and maintain the health of the plants, the building’s interior will include high bay spaces on five floors totaling approximately 65,000 SF and capable of accommodating mature trees. The exterior enclosure will be highly transparent and be composed primarily of multiple layers of glass supported by a metal framework. In addition to a variety of workplace environments, the facility will incorporate dining, meeting and lounge spaces, as well as a variety of botanical zonesmodeled on montane ecologies found around the globe. The building will be anchored at either end by publically accessible retail spaces entered from 6th and 7th Avenues.

Generally, it all sounds very cool and very futuristic and very trendy (read: Apple did the whole “plans for a spaceship” thing ages ago). However, it’s interesting to see how the biggest companies in tech are tackling the issue of working in an office or with a more loose structure.

Remember, everyone made a pretty big deal out of Marissa Mayer’s recent policy change that requires all Yahoo employees to work in an office. And just recently she announced that Yahoo would be taking up space in the Times building in New York’s Times Square, which is capable of housing up to 700 employees.

As it stands now, all of the big four tech companies — Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon — favor keeping employees in the office.

Google has one of the best campuses you could dream of, both in Mountain View and in New York, feeding employees free lunch from world-renowned chefs. Apple is working to build out one of Steve Jobs’ final projects, a new spaceship office. Facebook has the same diversions: chess boards, and video games, and basketball courts, and free lunch.

So of course, the fourth horseman in the race, Amazon is devising its own tricks to keep employees at the office as long as possible. It’s a win-win: Employees do more and better work due to a pleasing and comfortable work environment, and employers get more, and better work, out of their employees.

Also, there’s a perfectly good park just three blocks from the new campus.

Here’s the full set of plans:

Amazon’s new HQ design by John Cook

[Biodome rendering via NBBJ]


Former Google Exec Turns Whistleblower On Company’s Tax Avoidance Machinations In The UK

Google Logo 2010

Google is under fire in the UK for its tax practices in the country, and a new key witness (who spoke to The Sunday Times) might put them in deeper hot water when he hands over a reported 100,000 emails and documents to the British Revenue & Customs (HRMC) services. Barney Jones, a former Googler who was at the company between 2004 and 2006, says he has material proof that Google’s London sales staff which would negotiate and close sales for the UK market, despite claiming its Dublin HQ handled finalizing all deals.

Jones was prompted to speak out by testimony given to the Commons Public Accounts Committee (PAC) last week by Google VP Matt Brittin, who said that London-based Google staff were never closing any ad sales deals, though some selling efforts were made there. Brittin had previously gone on record in November 2012 with statements asserting that no one in the London office was doing any kind of ad selling.

The matter of where the deals were finalized is especially important because if a sale closes in London, it’s likely they’d be taxable in Britain, rather than in the extremely low tax-rated Ireland. Jones told the Sunday Times that Google is fully aware of this, yet there are still records of Google staff closing major deals from companies like eBay and Lloyds TSB, but Google doesn’t seem at all certain that any of the documentation will absolutely prove that it has done anything strictly against UK tax law, according to a statement provided by Google Direct of External Relations Peter Barron to the Sunday Times.

“As we said in front of the public accounts committee, it is difficult to respond fully to documents we have not seen,” the statement reads. “These questions relate to Google’s business in the UK going back a decade or more. None of the allegations put to us change the fact that Google pays the corporate tax due on its UK activities and complies fully with UK law.” Google reiterated this statement to TechCrunch when we contacted them for comment.

Ireland uses its lower corporate taxation rate, which is 12.5 percent, or a little over half of Britain’s 23 percent, to attract big names who base their European corporate headquarters there, including Apple and Facebook in addition to Google. The search giant is currently under fire from UK parliament members for its tax practices, thanks to a Reuters investigation that revealed statements it made last November to the PAC about its London operations may not have been entirely accurate.

Amazon is next in the PAC’s sights for its UK tax practices, as Reuters has also recently uncovered evidence to suggest that it, too, is doing a lot of selling through an autonomous London-based unit, despite routing its sales on paper through a tax-exempt affiliate based in Luxembourg. In fact, for most on Google’s footing, avoiding taxes seems to be the exception, not the rule, and a recent piece by V3′s Madeline Bennett explains that even if this fresh round of hearings reveals that these schemes do run afoul of UK tax regulations, it’s unlikely we’ll see situations change all that dramatically. Governments are too dependent on the general economic benefits of hosting big corporations, and get too much out of awarding them contracts, she says, to risk doing long-term harm to those arrangements.

Still, what Jones claims to have would be incredibly embarrassing for Google, especially if it spells out in no uncertain terms that closing deals was regularly handled by Google’s London staff, in direct contradiction to what Brittin has told the committee, but until we see the goods, there’s no telling how deep down the rabbit hole his information actually goes.


YouTube Subscriptions and Other News You Need to Know

Youtube
Feed-twFeed-fb

Welcome to this morning's edition of "First To Know," a series in which we keep you in the know on what's happening in the digital world.

Today, we're looking at three particularly interesting storiesYouTube has announced a new pilot program for paid content. Select partners can now offer their videos for a la carte monthly subscriptionsAmazon may be working on a 3D phone, according to a Wall Street Journal report. Finally, Facebook has issued its first update for Home.

Check out the video above for more on these stories.

Thumbnail image via iStockphoto, ozgurdonmaz Read more...

More about Google, Youtube, Amazon, Facebook, and Netflix

Google’s Eric Schmidt On Facebook Home-Style Android Modification: “I Think It’s Fantastic”

schmidt-atd

Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt was on stage today at AllThingsD’s Dive Into Mobile event in NYC, talking about his book and his vision for Google. When asked about how he and Google feel about projects that take Android as their base and then build something different with them, like Amazon’s KindleOS or Facebook Home. Schmidt’s response was extremely positive.

On the subject of Android forking and Facebook Home, he responded “I think it’s fantastic.” “This is what open source is all about,” he said, adding that he “suspect[s] it’s one of the few reasons Android is the number one solution right now.” At the time of its unveiling, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said that his company didn’t even have to work with Google to make Home a reality.

That, and Facebook Home UX features, like the removal of the Google search bar from the home screen, and in general the backgrounding of various Google features, led some to speculate that it isn’t exactly something Google would be thrilled with. Google issued an official statement on the matter, talking about how it “demonstrates the openness and flexibility that has made Android so popular.”

Schmidt’s statement stuck to the company line but also went further, indicating an enthusiasm for efforts like those undertaken by Facebook and Android. He said that people who don’t work with open source technology can’t seem to understand the value of people taking your OS and doing something different with it, but at Google, there’s a genuine appreciate for those kinds of projects.

“This is called ‘what Android is about,’” he said later in response to a question by Business Insider’s Steve Kovach. “[Facebook] read the rules and they adhered to them. If you look at what Facebook did they maintained full application compatibility. I think it’s a tremendous endorsement of the platform and what it can do.”


Google’s Eric Schmidt On Facebook Home-Style Android Modification: “I Think It’s Fantastic”

schmidt-atd

Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt was on stage today at AllThingsD’s Dive Into Mobile event in NYC, talking about his book and his vision for Google. When asked about how he and Google feel about projects that take Android as their base and then build something different with them, like Amazon’s KindleOS or Facebook Home. Schmidt’s response was extremely positive.

On the subject of Android forking and Facebook Home, he responded “I think it’s fantastic.” “This is what open source is all about,” he said, adding that he “suspect[s] it’s one of the few reasons Android is the number one solution right now.” At the time of its unveiling, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said that his company didn’t even have to work with Google to make Home a reality.

That, and Facebook Home UX features, like the removal of the Google search bar from the home screen, and in general the backgrounding of various Google features, led some to speculate that it isn’t exactly something Google would be thrilled with. Google issued an official statement on the matter, talking about how it “demonstrates the openness and flexibility that has made Android so popular.”

Schmidt’s statement stuck to the company line but also went further, indicating an enthusiasm for efforts like those undertaken by Facebook and Android. He said that people who don’t work with open source technology can’t seem to understand the value of people taking your OS and doing something different with it, but at Google, there’s a genuine appreciate for those kinds of projects.

“This is called ‘what Android is about,’” he said later in response to a question by Business Insider’s Steve Kovach. “[Facebook] read the rules and they adhered to them. If you look at what Facebook did they maintained full application compatibility. I think it’s a tremendous endorsement of the platform and what it can do.”


Facebook’s Android Event and Other News You Need to Know

Mark
Feed-twFeed-fb

Welcome to this morning's edition of "First To Know," a series in which we keep you in the know on what's happening in the digital world.

Today, we're looking at three particularly interesting stories. Facebook has issued invitations to the press to “come see our new home on Android.” Amazon is set to acquire book recommendation site Goodreads. Finally, Klout is now adding your Instagram photos to its social media score calculations.

Check out the video above for more on these stories.

Image courtesy Flickr, deneyterrio Read more...

More about Amazon, Facebook, Android, Features, and Klout

Bango Adds Telefonica To Its List Of Mobile Carrier Billing Partners For Facebook And Beyond

Old Cash Register

Mobile payments company Bango — partner to Facebook, Amazon, BlackBerry and others to enable app and content charges directly to your mobile phone bill — has announced another major carrier partner: Telefonica is enabling Bango payments via its payment API.

The global deal (RNS statement embedded below) will mean that developers who make apps for Telefonica’s 314 million subscribers will be able to integrate a single API into their apps and mobile websites to enable two-click carrier payments across app stores in Bango’s network. These include Facebook’s App Center, Google Play, BlackBerry App World, Amazon’s Appstore, Windows Phone Store, Opera’s app store and an upcoming app storefront that Bango says it’s keeping under wraps for now. (My guess: an app storefront for Firefox Mobile, since Telefonica is a partner in that venture, but who knows — maybe it’s Apple finally coming around to carrier billing…)

This deal builds on the news from July 2012 that Telefonica had signed global agreements with Google, Facebook, Microsoft and RIM for billing content on their app stores. Meanwhile, Bango also counts France Telecom among its other carrier customers.

Financial terms of this new deal were not disclosed, nor were its revenue-sharing/commission details, which Telefonica says will vary on a country-by-country, store-by-store basis.

Bango is not Telefonica’s first carrier billing partner. It also works with Boku, which received a $35 million strategic investment led by the carrier last year. Jose Valles, the head of BlueVia at Telefonica Digital, says that working with one does not cancel out the other.

“This is not exclusive,” he said in an interview with TechCrunch. “This is about enhancing the ecosystem. Not all companies work with Bango and not all companies work with Boku, so we will be collaborating with both of them.”

Nor is the the first time the two have worked together. Bango first provided Telefonica with a carrier billing solution some 10 years ago (without the use of an API to interconnect to third party sites).

Although Telefonica has been offering carrier billing for a while now via its own payment APIs, the difference here is that Bango has already forged the deals with multiple app store providers. This makes its single API more powerful and less complicated to implement.

“It gives us a focus on app stores and frictionless, low-click payments,” said Matt Dicks, head of marketing for Blue Via, Telefonica’s developer platform. “That’s not what telcos do very well.” Blue Via is integrating Bango’s API with other APIs that link into Telefonica services, such as messaging, VoIP and more.

Bango says that apps and other content enabled with carrier billing have a 77 percent conversion rate, compared to 40 percent for content that requires credit card or other payment information. But there is still a lot of work that needs to be done to make carrier billing ubiquitous and used more.

“The big Internet companies are still not fully engaged about the opportunity with operator billing,” admitted Anil Malhotra, VP of strategic partnerships for Bango. In that sense, these deals work both ways for Bango. The more carrier partners it racks up, the more likely companies like Twitter, Nintendo and Sony will also integrate billing into their services — if and when such a need arises.

That is also boosted by another initiative launched by Telefonica — to integrate more carriers onto its API platform. The first of these is Telenor, with more expected to be announced in due course.

“BlueVia is a bold and valuable initiative by Telefonica to establish a unified set of billing APIs. We will standardize on BlueVia to connect with Telefonica’s 314 million subscribers around the world and look forward to welcoming other operators who join this initiative, as Telenor has done,” said Bango CEO Ray Anderson in a statement.

Although the opportunity for carrier billing is one that applies to any market, one of the big aims in this deal in particular is for emerging markets in Telefonica’s footprint — specifically Latin America.

In countries like El Salvador, Venezuela and Brazil, credit and debit card penetration is relatively low, so Telefonica, developers and others in the app ecosystem need other routes for payments. This is where carrier billing perhaps comes into its own, as a mass infrastructure for the “next billion” smartphone users to make mobile content purchases on their devices.

Release below.

Bango and Telefónica announce global mobile payments partnership

Cambridge and Madrid, January 17th, 2013. Bango (AIM: BGO), the mobile payments and analytics company, and Telefónica Digital today announce that they have signed a Global Framework Agreement. The two companies will partner globally to create an enhanced direct-to-bill payment experience for mobile app stores. The partnership will combine Bango’s frictionless payment experience with Telefónica’s BlueVia Payment APIs, connecting over 314 million chargeable customers worldwide to the Bango Payments Platform.

The ability to pay for digital goods and services via a mobile phone bill or prepay credit is a key way for content owners and developers to fully monetize their products. This is especially the case in developing markets, such as Latin America, where penetration of bank accounts and credit cards is very low. Trials of direct to bill in Telefónica operating businesses have proven its ability to drive sales. Where Bango has introduced operator billing to developed markets with high credit card penetration, sales of digital goods have increased significantly.

By integrating the single BlueVia billing API into the Bango Payments Platform app stores will benefit from Bango’s enhanced user experience for mobile devices, which generates higher payment conversion rates, especially from Wi-Fi-connected and other “off-network” devices. This is particularly important for the future of mobile payments as more than half of smartphones browsing app stores use Wi-Fi connections.

A key goal of the partnership is to accelerate the availability of a standardized and open payment platform for all app stores and content providers and to dramatically improve the customer experience. The platform will be available to all app stores, supporting operator-billing and other payment methods through a single, common platform. The advantage to the customer is a seamless payment flow with no requirement to enter personal information or leave the payment session.

As well as technology to improve the user experience, Bango is contributing to the partnership its market-leading expertise in managing payments at mass scale, developed over several years with industry-leading partners such as RIM, Facebook, Opera and others. The Bango platform expands the attractiveness of operator billing to third parties by automating all settlement processes, including tax reconciliation, local currency support and providing sophisticated analytics and reporting that enable App Stores to optimize the mobile user experience.

Telefónica is rolling out direct to bill capabilities in its operating businesses and earlier this year announced global, framework agreements with Facebook, Google, Microsoft and RIM.

Bango CEO Ray Anderson commented that “Telefonica and Bango share a strategic vision: to widen access to paid content by standardizing and simplifying operator-billed mobile payments. BlueVia is a bold and valuable initiative by Telefonica to establish a unified set of billing APIs. We will standardize on BlueVia to connect with Telefónica’s 314 million subscribers around the world and look forward to welcoming other operators who join this initiative, as Telenor has done”.

Speaking for Telefónica Digital, Jose Valles, Head of BlueVia, said: “At the heart of every great service is first class customer experience and both Bango and BlueVia share the vision that mobile payments must be seamless and low friction for the customer. Through this partnership, we are delivering a mobile billing ecosystem that empowers the app store and content owners to achieve mass scale in their business through global reach and a payment method far broader than credit cards”.

The partnership between Telefónica and Bango was negotiated by Telefónica’s Financial Services and Global Partnership teams, based in Madrid and Silicon Valley and headed by Joaquín Mata and Wayne Thorsen, respectively.

Photo: Flickr


Top Comments: Readers Debate ‘Booth Babes’ and Zuck’s Message Fee

Semi-naked CES "Booth Babes," the status of CDs in today’s digital world, a hefty fee to message Mark Zuckerberg, and Google's decision to make the Google Maps app unavailable to Windows users were all hotly contested topics. We've pulled together our favorite comments of the week to show off the best conversations and the biggest debates.

A California-based hard drive company chose to include colorfully painted, topless women in its 2013 CES presentation, incurring tons of responses via social media. Some commenters voiced support and others were vehemently against the display. Our readers hotly debated the ethics of "booth babes" at trade shows and in advertising in general.

Google Could Loosen Amazon’s Cloud Grip With Pay-Per-Use API Services

Potter_Amazon_Google

Editor’s note: Chris Potter is co-founder of ScreenLight, a cloud video collaboration service for video producers to review and approve video with their teams and clients. Follow him on Twitter @potta.

Google recently rolled out a number of enhancements to its Cloud Platform products. With these changes, it’s clear that Google is aiming its sights directly at Amazon Web Services, not to mention other infrastructure-as-a-service providers, such as Windows Azure, Rackspace, HP, and other OpenStack providers.

With its global reach, Google has the economies of scale that could eventually allow it to underprice all but Amazon for raw computing power, network connectivity, and other basic infrastructure services. However, going head to head with Amazon has significant challenges, not the least of which is Amazon’s significant head start in developing a rapidly increasing number of very granular services, as well as its success in winning the hearts and minds of developers.

While it’s still early days in this market, if Google is going to displace a strong and entrenched competitor such as AWS, it’s going to have to be incrementally better or significantly cheaper. Alternatively, Google could try to redefine the game to be one that it has a greater chance of winning.

Rather than competing head-on, perhaps a better strategy for Google would be to build on its strength of developing highly scalable web and mobile applications. While all of its competitors focus on selling infrastructure as a service, Google could pair that with pay-per-use API services that could be linked together by developers to build upon.

A focused set of services that solve common problems or eliminate time-consuming development and integration tasks would help developers build apps faster. This would be of use to both application developers and enterprise customers looking to move to the cloud. Some examples of these services, which will be examined in more detail below, include accelerated file uploads, video encoding, and real-time communication services.

There is no doubt that there is a market for these types of services. Well-designed API-based services allow developers to move more quickly and focus on the unique differentiators of their applications. Right now, a challenge for developers is that they have to select and test the APIs of a number of different service providers before deciding which ones to integrate. If each one has a different pricing model, terms of service, and documentation style, this adds transaction costs and negates some of the savings. As such, developers could benefit from getting some of these core APIs from a single provider under a single business model and set of terms. Google API services could provide a secure, reliable, and trusted foundation for development.

Platform as a service (PaaS) vendors like Heroku, Engine Yard, and Joyent have started to fill this role by partnering with a number of companies that provide add-on services that make it easier for developers to build full-featured apps. Heroku alone lists over 100 partners (a number of which offer competing services) that include databases, platform/stack, management and monitoring, and app development APIs for billing, real-time push communication, etc. That being said, they act more like aggregators than a single point of contact.

Google has unique strengths when it comes to building scalable cross-platform web and mobile services. None of the other IaaS or PaaS providers, including Amazon, have demonstrated true capabilities in this area. Google has an opportunity to shift the dimensions of competition and attract developers and enterprise customers to its fledgeling cloud services platform by providing a number of APIs that help them solve some of the core problems associated with building web applications. The following sections detail some of the areas that Google should consider.

Accelerated Data Transfer

One of the bottlenecks with big data applications, video services, and data archiving is transferring massive amounts of data into the cloud. TCP-based transport protocols like FTP and HTTP are inefficient for transferring really large data sets at high speeds.

Amazon has sidestepped this problem by promoting Aspera and its faspex protocol to accelerate uploads. But Aspera is a high-priced partner that is just figuring out how to sell its software as a cloud service. Unpublished pricing, monthly minimums, and an enterprise sales model pose barriers to developers who might otherwise find the services valuable.

Google could build accelerated data transfer into its cloud storage and compute services. While other competitors may have issues developing an accelerated transfer protocol, with projects like SPDY (Google’s proposal to speed up web communications), Google has the talent to solve this problem for its customers.

If Google didn’t want to build this itself, Signiant, FileCatalyst or even Aspera would be acquisition candidates that could speed time to market. Acquiring Aspera in particular would be a thorn in Amazon’s side.

If an accelerated transfer protocol isn’t the answer for Google, there are other ways that it could make it easier for customers to get data into the cloud. One option would be to offer an upload API that reduces the distance that data is transferred by routing upload requests to the nearest point of presence (think of this like the reverse of a content delivery network) and then pushing them to the storage or compute region that the customer chooses via Google’s own fibre network. Filepicker.io would be a good foundation for a Google upload API.

Developers, enterprise customers, life sciences researchers, big pharma, or anyone else with massive datasets would benefit greatly from an easier and faster way to get data into the cloud.

Video Encoding

Developers of video applications would benefit from a low-cost video encoding service that is based on Google’s Cloud. Likewise, as the market for video explodes, broadcasters, studios, and over the top video services like Netflix are shifting from on-premise encoding to cloud services so that they can easily convert their libraries into the myriad of codecs and bit rates required to deliver video to growing array of devices.

Others have already stepped into this rapidly growing market, but to the best of my knowledge, none of them operate in Google’s cloud. Encoding.com, which just raised another $1.5 million from its existing investors, uses AWS and Rackspace. Zencoder, which Brightcove recently acquired for $27 million, runs on Amazon’s cloud. The rapid growth of these companies shows that there is value to solving this problem. Microsoft also senses the opportunity in this area and is previewing Azure Media Services that can be used to store, encrypt, encode, manage, and stream media content.

Google could easily leverage the encoding infrastructure used by YouTube, which is the largest encoding system on the planet. Doing so would give it economies of scale that couldn’t be matched by the other cloud encoding providers, and could significantly reduce the cost of encoding adaptive bit-rate video for streaming to desktops and mobile devices.

Another benefit of offering a cloud encoding service is that it would give Google another way to push adoption of WebM if it’s still inclined. Another decision point for content distributors is approaching with the release of H.265 and DASH video streaming. Google could also use its encoding service to influence which standards its customers use.

Real-Time Communication

Adding scaleable real-time communication features to web and mobile applications is another significant pain point for developers. Video conferencing, VoIP, SMS, and chat all use an alphabet soup of protocols.

Developers are currently turning to a number of standalone API services to solve this problem. Twilio, is broadly used for telephony services, while PubNub and Pusher provide increasingly popular APIs that are used to send real-time notifications and messages.

What unique capabilities would Google bring to the table? Well, Google+ Hangouts are a pretty fine way to chat with people and host virtual meetings. Opening up the technology behind Hangouts to developers as an API that they can easily integrate into their apps could unleash a storm of creativity. Offering this technology would also benefit Google by luring people away from Skype and Apple’s open FaceTime protocol. In the war of standards, it’s the technology that is most broadly adopted that generally wins.

Speech Recognition

In an increasingly mobile-dominated landscape, voice is going to be an increasingly popular way to interact with devices. While Siri may have popularized it, the voice war is far from over. Why not offer this as a technology that anyone can add to a mobile application? The more people use Google’s voice search technology in their apps, the easier it will be for the company to maintain its search dominance (and presumably advertising) on mobile devices.

The Potential For Google’s Long API List

The list of APIs that Google could open up and sell to developers on a pay-per-use basis is pretty long. It already offers some of these: email delivery and image processing through Google App Engine; Google Docs Viewer is already being used by developers (whether the terms of service allow it or not); and others APIs like mapping and location services use standardized terms and can be tightly integrated and distributed through its cloud platform.

Google doesn’t have to offer all of the services itself. For example, it could provide a task queuing service like Iron Worker. In this way, users wouldn’t have to spin servers up and down to scale an app. They could simply pass jobs to Google’s army of workers, and be charged for actual processing time for the tasks they send to the workers. Google could offer a library of its own workers, and it could provide developers a platform where they could upload and share their own worker recipes.

Choosing A Different Path To Unseat AWS

Google has a real opportunity to create a unique and valuable platform that leverages its global connectivity and its infrastructure, and plays to its strengths building massively scalable web and mobile applications. It”s a win-win proposition for app developers and Google.

Developers benefit from a powerful selection of APIs that could be integrated into web and mobile applications. This would help speed time to market and free up development resources that could then be devoted to working on unlocking the unique sources of value of their apps.

For Google, this strategy would have the immediate benefit of attracting developers to its new platform and would provide a tier of services that would differentiate it from Amazon and other pure Infrastructure as a Service providers. As Amazon broadens the scope of its granular services to include data warehousing, with its Redshift data warehouse service, Google can help developers by making it faster and easier to build applications using its services.

This strategy also has deeper platform benefits, as it would spur adoption of standards that Google is promoting in its large-scale battle with Apple, Amazon, and Facebook for dominance of the online landscape.


Amazon Integrates With Facebook to Launch Social Gifting Feature

Amazon just got a little more social.

The e-commerce giant launched a new gift feature Wednesday that lets your connect your Facebook account to Amazon in order to keep track of your friends' birthdays and anniversaries, as well as their shopping wish lists

Amazon is billing the new Friends and Family Gifting feature as a central hub for your gift ideas throughout the year. Once you connect your Facebook account, you'll be able to see the wish lists that your connections have created on Amazon as well as information about things they may have Liked through Facebook. You can also opt to receive e-mail reminders about upcoming birthdays and anniversaries

16 visitors online now
9 guests, 7 bots, 0 members
Max visitors today: 27 at 01:12 am EDT
This month: 44 at 05-20-2013 07:26 am EDT
This year: 112 at 04-11-2013 09:43 am EDT
All time: 112 at 04-11-2013 09:43 am EDT
Get Adobe Flash player